Choose language
  • NL
  • Current language: EN
Get in touch

Tool

Which GenAI model fits which work?

Price against position, by kind of work. Prices come from each provider’s own list; the position is our assessment. Both are accounted for below.

Strong and inexpensiveGPT-6 Astra, $20, position 95 of 100. GPT-5.5 Pro, $68, position 92 of 100. GPT-5.6 Sol, $8, position 85 of 100. GPT-5.6 Terra, $4.5, position 79 of 100. GPT-5.3 Codex, $4.8, position 76 of 100. GPT-5.4 Mini, $1.7, position 65 of 100. GPT-5.6 Luna, $0.45, position 60 of 100. GPT-5 Nano, $0.14, position 43 of 100. Claude Fable 5.1, $20, position 94 of 100. Claude Opus 5, $10, position 90 of 100. Claude Sonnet 5, $4, position 81 of 100. Claude Haiku 4.5, $2, position 68 of 100. Gemini 3.1 Pro, $4.5, position 83 of 100. Gemini 3.8 Flash, $1.5, position 71 of 100. Gemini 3.5 Flash, $3.4, position 63 of 100. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, $0.85, position 54 of 100. Gemini 2.5 Pro, $3.4, position 74 of 100. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, $0.17, position 47 of 100Strong and inexpensive$0.10$0.30$1$3$10$30$1000255075100Cost per million tokens — expensive left, cheap rightPosition (0–100)GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5 NanoClaude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
General purpose
ModelProviderCostPositionSource
GPT-6 AstraPositioned at the top on reasoning-heavy work; leads published reasoning indices.OpenAI$2010 in / 50 out95Price list
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic's top tier; strongest published SWE-Bench Verified result in the family.Anthropic$2010 in / 50 out94Price list
GPT-5.5 ProThe most expensive option here by a wide margin. Justified only where a wrong answer costs more than the tokens.OpenAI$6830 in / 180 out92Price list
Claude Opus 5Leads head-to-head coding arena play.Anthropic$105 in / 25 out90Price list
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$84 in / 20 out85Price list
Gemini 3.1 ProPrice shown is the under-200k-token band; long context costs more.Google$4.52 in / 12 out83Price list
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$42 in / 10 out81Price list
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.52 in / 12 out79Price list
GPT-5.3 CodexSpecialised for code; priced as a mid-tier general model.OpenAI$4.81.75 in / 14 out76Price list
Gemini 2.5 ProPrevious generation, still widely deployed. Under-200k band.Google$3.41.25 in / 10 out74Price list
Gemini 3.8 FlashPromotional pricing until 31 December 2026.Google$1.50.75 in / 3.75 out71Price list
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic$21 in / 5 out68Price list
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI$1.70.75 in / 4.5 out65Price list
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle$3.41.5 in / 9 out63Price list
GPT-5.6 LunaThe cheapest current-generation flagship-family model on this chart.OpenAI$0.450.2 in / 1.2 out60Price list
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.850.3 in / 2.5 out54Price list
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.170.1 in / 0.4 out47Price list
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI$0.140.05 in / 0.4 out43Price list

Data checked on 7 September 2026.

How to read this

The cost is factual. Every price comes from the provider’s own pricing page, with the date we checked it and a link to check it again. Shown is a blend of three parts input to one part output — the shape of typical drafting and retrieval work. An agentic workload inverts that ratio and shifts the cost to the left.

The position is not a benchmark score. No public benchmark scores all of these models on all of these kinds of work, and inventing a number to fill that gap would be the only dishonest thing in this tool. The position is our assessment, anchored on the capability ladder each provider publishes itself.

Image and video models charge per output, not per token. The media view puts one image beside a five-second clip; where a provider quotes a range, the midpoint is shown. Those assumptions are stated here because they decide the number.